Organizers:
Nir Barnea
Racah Institute of Physics
nir@phys.huji.ac.il
Silas Beane
University of Washington
silas@uw.edu
Zohreh Davoudi
MIT
davoudi@mit.edu
Ubirajara van Kolck
IPN Orsay/University of Arizona
vankolck@ipno.in2p3.fr
Program Coordinator:
Kimberlee Choe
jy24@uw.edu
(206) 6853509
Seminar schedules
Application form
For full consideration, please apply by September 30, 2015.
Talks online
Exit report
Visitor Information
Friends of the INT
Obtain an INT preprint number
INT homepage

INT Program INT161
Nuclear Physics from Lattice QCD
March 21  May 27, 2016
The last decade has witnessed dramatic progress in three directions: lattice quantum chromodynamics
(LQCD), nuclear effective field theories (NEFT) and ab initio nuclearstructure methods (AIM). All of these research directions aim to fully base nuclear
physics upon the underlying theory of strong interactions, QCD, and to provide predictions for nuclear observables with fully controlled uncertainties. The
INT program "Nuclear Physics from LQCD" will bring together leading experts in these three subdisciplines and plans to build a community that will analyze,
direct and support the LQCD effort. Each of the three subfields mentioned above has specific computational and theoretical problems, such as finitevolume
artifacts and signaltonoise issues in LQCD, ultravioletcutoff dependence in NEFT, and modelspace limitations in AIMs. These problems significantly affect
the scope of the results, and, in particular, the uncertainties associated with quantitative calculations of observables of interest. A few of the key questions
that would be addressed include:

AIMs require
input, such as fewbody forces, in order to make predictions for nuclei. What observables should LQCD compute beyond the binding energies of light nuclei in order to impact ab initio calculations?

LQCD calculations are simpler and, with the current computational resources, more precise at large unphysical quark masses. How does one extrapolate these results to the physical point using NEFTs, and what is the range of validity of these effective field theories?

The statistical analysis of large data sets and finitevolume methods are technologies common to both LQCD and ab initio nuclearstructure physicists. Are there interesting areas of overlap in these and other technologies that could lead to progress in one or both of these subdisciplines?

In each of the three subdisciplines, ultraviolet and infrared cutoffs are imposed to limit the model spaces where explicit calculations are performed. Can the errors due to these truncations be estimated, and reliable extrapolation methods be developed?

The connection between LQCD calculations of energy eigenvalues and the physical scattering amplitudes is well developed in the twoparticle sector by
the use of the Lüscher method. Can we expect to reach the same level of maturity in the three(multi)particle sector? What are the prospects and practical
limitations of newlydeveloped formalisms above multiparticle inelastic thresholds?

Theoretical uncertainties in nuclear matrix elements continue to
be a dominant source of error in the program that aims to test the standard model and search for new physics. What are the prospects of firstprinciples QCD
calculations of nuclear matrix elements, and what role LQCD can play in improving/complementing the NEFT and ab initio manybody calculations of these quantities?
Given the rapid advances in highperformance computing which are allowing for evermore sophisticated LQCD and ab initio nuclearstructure
calculations,
it is timely for the community to start taking steps towards overcoming all such conceptual, formal and technical challenges. Such progress would boost
us towards the common goal of making reliable predictions for some of the most important nuclear physics observables from the underlying theory of QCD.
We encourage all the interested scientists in these subfields of nuclear physics to apply. The participation of, and input from, young as well as
underrepresented researchers in these areas are particularly welcome. We plan to follow the standard format of one daily talk with plenty of time for
discussions and collaborations.
