DUSEL Updates

NUSEL Update #9 - February 3, 2004

1) Thanks & Kevin Lesko
2) Advice
3) NUSEL supporters group
4) Icicle Creek

1) Thanks & Kevin Lesko: This is my ninth and last NUSEL update. I stepped down as the Homestake Collaboration spokesperson on January 6. While it is disappointing not to have gotten closer to NUSEL groundbreaking, working with the group was certainly not a disappointment! For a community not used to organizing, I think things went well. I want to thank every collaboration member for your support and help over the past two years. You were great individually and as a group, always willing to pitch in when needed.

The Executive Committee has wisely decided that Kevin Lesko will now coordinate our efforts. Kevin, from Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, has been in the middle of NUSEL activities for a very long time. He was cochair of the Bahcall Committee and instrumental in the Technical Subcommittee's work. He also has logged many, many hours underground at SNO, so he should know what our community needs! Kevin is a great choice, and I hope you will give him your full support.

2) Advice: I continue to hope that matters will work out at Homestake. The advice that I have given the group over the past eight months is to continue to support the Reference Design proposal, as I believe the proposal is solid, as detailed as possible, fairly costed, and consistent with the Bahcall Committee vision of creating a world-leading laboratory. If we could get a definitive site agreement and a South Dakota proposal to dewater, we'd be back in the game.

3) NUSEL Supporters Group: Several people in the last month suggested independently that we should have a NUSEL support group that is site independent. One goal would be to have support for NUSEL as a concept embraced by the largest possible community. To that end we have set up a web page that links to current (and we will add future) proposals:

http://www.int.washington.edu/DUSEL/

Please join the group by filling out the form you will find there. Group members (but not emails) will be listed; the email list will be made available to any group wanting to communicate about NUSEL science (no politics!)

4) Icicle Creek: One reason for stepping down at this time was a decision reached recently to submit a proposal for the Icicle Creek site. NUSEL has yet to reach the Science Board, and there are indications from the NSF that their roadmap for the laboratory may be a deliberate one. For this reason we want to put a backup idea on the table, in case the NSF decides it needs one. We intend to make the proposal public on approximately March 1.

Cheers,
Wick